Wow. I am positively impressed by all the nice emails that have followed
this announce. They all look very good and bode well for the future !
:-)

Thank you Jason for thanking me but all the merit goes to you who have
had the courage to propose this change !

Let's do it!

Cheers,
-Vincent

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 05 June 2002 01:29
> To: Avalon Developers List
> Subject: Avalon and Turbine
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Just thought I would share some preliminary good news. Informally in
IRC
> we have decided that in Turbine land we will push as much of our bean
> type code into the commons, drop our service and component packages
and
> use Avalon instead. Five of the core people have agreed, but I'm not
> interested in rolling another component framework in straight Java (as
> opposed to AspectJ) so I will push for Avalon's use. The last person I
> have to convince is Jon :-) I will be posting something to the Turbine
> list tomorrow but things look good so far. So if there's anyone who
> wants to join in to possibly temper the discussion feel free.
> 
> Technically I think this is the best thing for Turbine, and hopefully
it
> will start to close some of the rifts that have formed in Jakarta over
> the last couple of years.
> 
> I would like to thank Vincent Massol for convincing me that it would
be
> in Turbine's best interest to use Avalon :-)
> 
> --
> jvz.
> 
> Jason van Zyl
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> http://tambora.zenplex.org
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to