Peter Donald wrote:
> At 05:14 AM 6/9/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>
>> Can do - but I will need to maintain a seperate jar for config
>> becuase its used in the ORB project both on the Apache and SF CVS
>> (but its ok because I swithch things before the next release). I
>> take a look at things tommorow evening and come up with a proposal
>> for packages for the related packages.
>
>
> You can keep it in the same package just move the source tree over so
> theres less confusion what they are associated with.
Well - that's the problem - both ContextUtil and CascadingConfiguration
of not tied to Merlin and bundling them in the same package is basically
poluting Merlin and creating less clarity about what these things are
and what they can do. We talked before about extensions to
configuration concerning things like "get children using key" and so -
and the idea then was to put those sort of things into a seperate
package. I agree that CascadingConfiguration is somewhat lonely all by
itself - but its one hell of a usefull service. In fact I think it
would be quite appropriate to include it in the framework. The
ContextUtil is another matter as that needs more work on documentation
and some functional stuff (no problem about moving one that into the
Merlin package).
Cheers, Steve.
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
