On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 18:14, Fredrik Hultin wrote: > I have a question as a newbie user of Avalon. > Even though ComponentManager maybe is not the *perfect* name for what > you want to achieve it is still used by all users of the Avalon > framework isn't it? So why not keep the name so old users doesn't have > to relearn or read the developer lists to understand what has happened > to the ComponentManager.
valid point. The reason we want to change it is because there is a lot of confusion among both users and developers (hence the recent discussions) what it does. The alternative would be to state, very clearly "this is a misnamed interface, all it really does is provide a lightweight lookup mechanism". Two bads to weigh against one another. > As documentation doesn't seem to be you're main > interest uhh...we've tried really hard to produce good docs on avalon framework...we just find it very difficult. - Leo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
