On Saturday 15 June 2002 05:16 pm, Stephen McConnell wrote: > > 1) are Initializable and Disposable separate concerns? If so we should > > split the interface. If not, then we will leave it alone > > I don't think there is a justification for change for the pattern from > 4.1 (i.e. Initializable and Disposable are seperate interfaces) - i.e. > we should return A5 proposal on this point back to A4.
I also think separate concerns. Up until recent discussions I was under the impression that Disposable was the opposite of Composable, not Initializable. +1 on moving back to separate interfaces. -pete -- peter royal -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
