Marcus Crafter wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 08:55:07AM -0400, Berin Loritsch wrote:
>
>
>>We keep talking about the ECM as if it were an exemplary container,
>>and we all know it is not. Please do not pretend to give migration
>>paths for it. We should encourage the migration to one of the other
>>containers, be it Fortress, Phoenix, or Merlin.
>>
>>ECM should be considered a backwards compatibility layer, and
>>deprecated.
>>Before we can slap the deprecation declaration on the package we must
>>finish the proposed replacement (Fortress) so that it is easier to use
>>and to develop with.
>>
>>
>
> What's still left to be done on Fortress ?
>
And how does Forturss relate to Merlin.
What oportunities exist for mutual plundering?
Cheers, Steve.
>
> Cheers
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
