Paul Hammant wrote:
> Pete,
>
>>> I am -10 on chainsaw-grade reduction.
>>
>>
>>
>> To be fair, there is a lot of very high grade emotional investment in
>> Avalon by all committers. Paul, you make the above outline, and then
>> say that you are against the chainsaw-grade reduction. But to another
>> viewer, the very outline you proposed is a such a chainsaw approach,
>> it just didn't seem like a chain saw to you.
>
>
> No, I think that the naming suggestions proposed are the solution.
> That with improved xdocs. I don't want to trim any projects from our
> CVS or rename any CVS entities. That is, unless they have garnered a
> larger community, and need self-suffciency. If CVS is hacked to bits
> and no work is done of the xdocs, then we weill be no nearer having a
> clear message for newbies in six months.
> Naming/branding/documentation is our issue not packaging/directories.
+1
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
