Peter Donald wrote:
>On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 10:13, Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
>
>>>Finally, as you say MicroContainer must sometime be rewritten and
>>>reworked. That is not something I didn't already know. But could you
>>>tell me in what way?
>>>
>>>
>>A lot of clues above - more discussion nees to be on another thread -
>>the stuff I have concerning Merlin II is really only dealing with the
>>auto assembly aspect at the moment and even then its not completed.
>>Merlin II can be supplied with a component instantiation profile and
>>figure everything out from there - but the code base today is limited to
>>getting the details together of a preferred application profile. I have
>>not solved component activation ordering and activation although this
>>should be solved reasonably quickly. The main work to be done is
>>figuring out the container hierarchy model which is the critical
>>element. If the stuff I've done on Merlin II look promising and
>>something you or anyone else would be interested in collaborating on,
>>I'll go ahead and commit it into the Excalibur CVS -
>>
>>
>
>Please. I am working on similar stuff for Myrmidon and if I could ... errr ...
>borrow your code it would be great ;)
>
>
Ok - no problem - but beware - its a moving target - and
1. I'm really pissed off that ComponentMetaData does not include context
criteria ..!
2. I'm not giving up on this so get ready for a fight ;-)
3. Cascading configurations rock - so look out for a pluggable
ComponentInfo internalization handler!
4. Kernel is cool but needs seperation from the container.
5. DependecyMap is driving me crazy!
Cheers, Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
