Leo Sutic wrote:
>
>
>>From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>
>>To be concrete, this is the Cocoon Context:
>>
>>
>>
>
>Nicola, I do not understand what you're getting at.
>
>My point is that if the context is only constants that
>are entered by an assembler (a person), then it is not
>different from a Configuration.
>
>
Disagree - a configuration is an object model that provides access to
basic types (Strings, booleans, long, int, etc.). It has no support for
complex types (e.g. java.io.File). A context object created using
directives prepared by an assembler can contain directives for the
creation of basic AND complex types (see earlier example and
ContextFactory source). I can write directives for creation of objects
with multiple argument constructors - which basically means that minimal
effort is needed.
Cheers, Steve.
>/LS
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
