nope. +1 on this one. - Leo
On Sat, 2002-07-06 at 07:05, Peter Donald wrote: > Hiya, > > I was just about to move the XML bundle i18n utilities out of the > all/scratchpad to a top level component. However I noticed that the > associated documentation is in xmlbundle/ product. It seems that when Paul > was breaking out the code that he intended xmlbundle to be used to contain > the xml resource bundles. However later someone started adding xml > utilities into it. > > It kinda makes sense that resource bundles done in xml be named xml > bundles, so I was thinking it may be a good idea to rename the xml > utilities to xmlutil (or something). I can do some CVS hacking so we dont > miss out on CVS history. The only real change will be that the jar name > changes from excalibur-xmlbundle.jar to excalibur-xmlutil.jar. > > Any objections on me doing the rename? > > > Cheers, > > Peter Donald > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, > and proving that there is no need to do so - almost > everyone gets busy on the proof." > - John Kenneth Galbraith > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
