On Wednesday 10 July 2002 09:51 am, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> > Think of the design practicality.  If a store were poolable, you have
> > no guarantee of getting a hold of the store that has the object you
> > placed in it again.  You would be SOL.
>
> With the exception of SQL store, XML:DB store, filesystem store, FTP
> store, etc.

Which could all be ThreadSafe easily :)
-pete

-- 
peter royal -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to