On Wednesday 10 July 2002 09:51 am, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > Think of the design practicality. If a store were poolable, you have > > no guarantee of getting a hold of the store that has the object you > > placed in it again. You would be SOL. > > With the exception of SQL store, XML:DB store, filesystem store, FTP > store, etc.
Which could all be ThreadSafe easily :) -pete -- peter royal -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>