> > this clarified a lot. Basically I was worried about how to express
> > 'ordering' of content, and it is only now I get that your idea here is
> > to express the ordering by having a filename specification.
> >
> or by having xpath lookups ;-)
> (the or is exclusive at your own coice)
> 
> in every case ordering based on xpath would be mostly not a good idea
> better use :
> - labeling: getting the caption for the menu from the file itself (more
> expressive then the filename often: eg for faq the full question)
> - filtering based on e.g. an attribute value priority="high" etc etc
> 
> (you'll even start to love xpath when we're done :-))

Truth be told I know quite a bit about xpath. It's just that its syntax
can get so horridly complex...it needs to be optional.

> > we've got two weeks to get something working (one of our developers has
> > set a fair 'deadline'; see it as a challenge =); otherwise we'll likely
> > use anakia for the next 6 months or so....
> >
> 
> I don't know anakia, and can't expect you to dislike it as a solution

anakia is coupling xml with velocity. It is neat in concept =)

> I'll do a serious effort the coming week is the only thing I can say

cool.

> If you can still evaluate then ?

the 'two week deadline' is not solid as a rock =) This is still OSS dev,
which is supposed to be somewhat fun at times...that deadline would be
two weeks from last friday or somethin'. I just find having deadlines
means stuff gets done...or you'll know when to abandon something when
you miss it by a month.

> Also, I'll be asking stupid questions to get around faster, so bear with me
> please...

no prob =)

> > once again, start simple. Most cocoon guys I know have the general
> > tendency to implement everything at once. Might be their one flaw =)
> 
> there must be more wrong with them ;-)

sssht! (they're listening...)

> > we're definately on the same page. It's just the tone of the forrest
> > website suffers from the same problems as the avalon one: way too
> > technical without getting enough examples, context, and general idea
> > first.
> 
> hey, blame yourself, you're in a 4.1 release, we're just starting 0.1,
> remember ;-)

we do blame ourselves, all the time =)

It's just most of avalon is best explained in a computer science master
class tone, and it is hard for some of us not to..............

> > I understand Nicola is active on forrest, which is why I mentioned the
> > project files. Integration with ant is instant added value; as is
> > integration with forrest.
> 
> I don't get this fully yet, but someone just told me I shouldn't try doing
> all at once :-)

hmm. Basically everyone uses and loves ant, so if there is a jar file
you can drop into your ant ext directory and then you have an
easy-to-use <forrest/> task, that is neat. However, if forrest is
worthy, someone will no doubt contribute that task...

> > the thing I want most. Doc tools change, DTDs should stay the same.
> 
> question was: are you using the forrest (cocoonbased) generation process?
> or are you using ant and <style> instead?

part of our site is cocoon (framework, excalibur, apps), while other
parts (logkit, phoenix) use anakia (the <anakia/> task). We used to be
completely cocoon but parts were converted to anakia because our
cocoon-based setup was broken (and slow when it did work). Some of us
are now going to put in time (though none of us ever has any =) to get
the cocoon-based setup work. When that fails it is likely we will
convert everything to anakia.

Either way, we will probably convert to the forrest DTDs.

> > yup. I look forward to having a neat system to use; problem is ours has
> > been broken there is not so much patience left. But don't let that rush
> > you into bad releases though =)
> 
> patience is a virtue, as is working hard I guess... so if it comes from both
> sides we'll get there

I don't doubt it. Just a matter of time, it is.

> and euh, we already had one bad release :-)
> this time it feels like I could have a *user* which will (no doubt) make it
> infinitaly better

I will not dig into development then =)

If you get everyone on the avalon-dev to be happy about forrest, you're
going to get loads of users. Avalon is one of the big projects around
here, documentation-wise.

> regards, and  be ready for some dull questions flying around tomorrow

=) Keeps me from actual work, so its welcome...

cheers,

- Leo



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to