Re* makes me a little nervouse :-)
Two reasons - (a) would like more time for focussing on the validation
of what exists before going down that path, and (b) I think the entire
Re* world needs a lot of thinking about in terms of the overall
implications.
Cheers, Steve.
Marcus Crafter wrote:
>Hi All,
>
> Hope everyone had a great weekend.
>
> Berin mentioned a few posts ago something which sparked my mind about
> the implementation of the Re* interfaces in Fortress.
>
> I thought about taking a look at implementing it, but I think I'm
> missing some of the concepts here.
>
> When are the following Re* methods actually intended to be invoked
> on implementing Components:
>
> o Recontextualizable
> o Recomposable
> o Reconfigure/Reparameterizable
>
> I can imagine a change in the .roles/.xconf files causing
> components to be reconfigured and given a new component manager
> reference, but perhaps that's wrong (?).
>
> Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
