Berin Loritsch wrote:
>Can we get some official releases of these containers before we
>deprecate?
>
>
Sounds good to me.
Steve.
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Leo Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 9:06 AM
>>To: Avalon Developers List
>>Subject: Re: Officially Deprecate ComponentManager and friends?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>I think it would be appropriate to include in the Javadoc an
>>>explination
>>>about the deprecation action and its relationship to the
>>>
>>>
>>4.X lifetime.
>>
>>
>>>The deprecation action specifically addresses an
>>>
>>>
>>unnecessary restriction
>>
>>
>>>introduced by the Component marker interface. Given deprecation of
>>>Component in favour of java.lang.Object, we imply deprication of
>>>ComponentManager, Composable, ComponentException and
>>>
>>>
>>ComponentSelector.
>>
>>
>>> In each case a replacement is provided (ServiceManager,
>>>
>>>
>>Serviceable,
>>
>>
>>>ServiceException and ServiceLocator). A javadoc description should
>>>include these details - together with a summary of the benefits
>>>introduced by this action. The javadoc should also be very
>>>
>>>
>>clear that
>>
>>
>>>the component family of interfaces will be around for the
>>>
>>>
>>life of 4.X.
>>
>>
>>>I could write something up along these lines and include it in the
>>>framework/component package.html.
>>>
>>>
>>yes please =)
>>
>>- LSD
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>><mailto:avalon-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>For
>>additional commands,
>>e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
