Peter Donald wrote:
>On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 14:49, Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
>
>>>>>Then I declare it a revolution.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>That is satisfactory.
>>>>
>>>>I will except to see this changed to be fork of the CVS head in the very
>>>>near future.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>you wont.
>>>
>>>
>>Would you care to justify this or should we conclude one of the following:
>>
>> (a) you do not think you are need to respect a veto issued by
>>another commiter
>> (b) you have a problem with written communications leading to an
>>inability to express your option
>> (c) you are just plain stubborn
>>
>>I look forward with eager anticipation to your answer!
>>
>>
>
>How about another conclusion.
>
>(d) Some kid doesn't know the rules
>
>I declared it a revolution. Revoultions don't need to be in forks (and
>generally aren't). If I ever want to release it as stable without decoration
>then it is a majority vote then.
>
>
>
So its one set of rules for you and another set of rules for everyone else?
I am a commiter to the containerkit project. I have added content and
provide several bug fixes. I use containerkit internally as part of
process of ensuring that the Avalon Meta Model remains a viable
solutions for Merlin, Fortress, Phoenix and anything leveraging
containerkit . Your changes are not acceptable to me and I re-state my
request - please revert your changes.
Should you desire to continue your blatant exploitation of the
org.apache.avalon.framework namespace I would appreciate it if you
consulted the Avalon community in advance.
Chers, Steve.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
