On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 10:57, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > I think you can view Tweety as a concept implementation, but not as a > > reference implementation. One thing it doesn't do for example is protect > > components from each other, or guarantee that the stuff a component can > > get from its SM has run up to initialize(). > > There's a lot of stuff like that, and adding it all in would make the > > code complex to the level where it will be quite a bit more difficult to > > understand. > > roger > > In fact I was thinking of eventually adding other systems > egg-tweety-birdy-pigeon-etc, but yes, it's a concept implementation. > > Where would you position it then phisically? I have no clue.
as in where in a potential unified CVS? In scratchpad atm, when it is finished it (and other stuff, like 'pigeon'), could be put into something like /src/tutorial/. cheers, - Leo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
