On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 11:59, Leo Simons wrote: <snip type="lots of blaat"/>
This thread is counterproductive, sorry for real bad wording guys. I can see people who clearly agree with me (and everyone else) on sentiment & principle feeling a need to respond something I put really badly. here's what I perhaps should have said: there has been a lot of talk about how vetoes have been used and misused, how it will be good for the community to go forward based on consensus if at all possible, etc etc. I just thought I'd bring this up in a separate thread so unaware people can be made aware and respond if they disagree with the general sentiment. > quoting Sam Ruby: > ---------------- > The alternative is to require consensus. Strive always to do as Noel so > eloquently described with the words "we did it as a community, we > support it as a community, and if necessary we'll fix it as a > community.". Achieving this will require changes in behavior from > pretty much everybody here. It will also be hard work. And require > much patience. And endurance. > ---------------- cheers, - Leo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
