Berin Loritsch wrote:
From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 01:31, Berin Loritsch wrote:
2) What is the timescale we are trying aim for? Can it go
into Phoenix and Merlin or is it a
revolution, thus only for uber-container?
It is a refinement of the Container/Component contracts.
I do not think that we have to preclude the casting of the
generic Context to a more specific context. I do think we
should have a minimal standard set of values that are always
bound to the Context--things that configurations won't be
able to handle.
The only truly generic entry is "name". There are others that
may be supplied
(directory, work directory, classloader) but they are far
from common among
all containers.
The rest of those would fit in the SE (Standard Edition)
container, but the "name" is all that would be required for
ME.
Seems ok to define different profiles for different containers.
So that components would be compatible with a given profile or higher.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
