Peter Donald wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:17, Leo Simons wrote:would you mind reflecting the changes into the FORREST-branch branch. The reason being that I hope to get time to update our website sometime soon.hi gang, I've just went through this paper replacing references to the component package with references to the service package. It'd be good if someone could proofread?
Yes, good suggestion.
The latest CVS version of Forrest now reports these errors correctly, before it simply reported that a page (link==linked page) couldn't be generated for some reason.The file is not well formed XML. You have to revert to 1.1, re-apply your changes and commit it. I founf the same problem when working on forrestizing it.What puzzles me is that the doc generation for some reason doesn't process framework.xml and then reports a missing link? Does this mean a syntax error in that file?
Grab the latest CVS with no fear, it's stable.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>