Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I get no vote,Which is something we will be addressing in our first P&P amendement - the policies and procedures concerning members, chair and all of that stuff. The role and relationship of people like yourself is an impotant aspect to be addressed.
Exciting isn't it!
:-)
but I'd like to extend support to the Avalon community for this step.
It's appreciated.
The issue is accounted for in that "it does not and should not exist at the level of the PMC". I agree with your follow-up reply to Berin that the addition of notes detailing the non-technical orientation of the PMC would be helpful within the descriptive text. I would also like state explicity that I think it would be a mistake to introduce any such wording into the P&P formal policy - as this immediately raises the question of the definition of what is technical and what is not. As the proposal stand, that's something that rests with the judgment of the respective PMC members.Stephen, one issue technically missing from your document. In all of the excitement to deal with Normal and Qualified votes, you defined Normal vote as "any vote not falling within the scope of a Qualified Majority Vote", but you forgot that there is still a class of votes for which there is a veto. That is the only thing that appears to be "wrong" with the docuement, unless I missed where you have accounted for that issue.
Cheers, Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
