On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 23:12, Leo Sutic wrote: > > From: Darrell DeBoer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > I certainly don't plan to fight tooth and nail over it. > > However, I've yet to see any argument where the benefits of > > requiring a castable context outweigh the added complexity. > > So yep, I still feel the same way; I'd rather keep the context > > simple. > > Are your opposition strong enough that you would veto it with a > -1, or is it of the "would accept it with a -0"-kind? (Read > below, I'll clarify some points.) The reason I'm asking is that > there is some consensus that this proposal would be acceptable > (not that everyone is crazy about it, but it is common ground, > which is more than we've had so far) to all.
Just a -0, and a non-binding one at that. I think I'll just let it go... (Call me beaten into submission ;) -- cheers, Darrell DeBoer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
