On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 19:51, Leo Simons wrote: > Peter Donald wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 22:10, Leo Simons wrote: > >>I'd also like to see some notice in the phoenix documentation that > >>although the meta materials are stable codewise (and supported as such), > >>we're not too sure about some aspects yet and thus that there may be big > >>changes in future versions (as we already know this, users should know > >>too :D). > > > > You are kidding right? > > nope. You?
Well if we follow your philosophy we may aswell mark everything as unstable and likely to change in future versions. There aint nothing that is fixed and we have not even got close to where we have been heading for last 3 years I been about. > >>I do think a version of containerkit should remain in avalon-sandbox as > >>there's stuff to harvest from it in the continuing "common meta setup" > >>area. > > > > nah. Abandoned code should be removed. > > It's not abandoned. Just waiting for refactoring/reintegration. If no one uses, developes or maintains it then it is abandoned. Someone can always "refactor" from the actively maintained code or get the archaic code out of history. -- Cheers, Peter Donald "Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions." -Oliver Wendell Holmes -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
