Sam, > > It is important because there is no certainty that Peter will be > > allowed back, or that others are not under some invisble axe.
> To my knowledge, no others are under similar consideration I believe that a stronger statement can be made. I had specifically raised that issue with ASF Chairman Greg Stein (yes, deliberately attributing the role in context). My e-mail to him, and his reply as the ASF Chairman, are archived: http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED] e.org&msgNo=15085 I refer to the statement that "[Other Avalon Committers have] absolutely nothing to worry about. Again, the action was not related specifically to Avalon, so we aren't looking at other Avalon committers right now." Your statement: > Let me make this *EXTREMELY*CLEAR*: > * If Peter wants this public, the board is ameanable. > * If Peter wants this private, his wishes will be respected. has been clear since the start of this episode. Peter has had the right to air the issues in public, and has been invited to do so more than once. He has chosen not to do so. --- Noel -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
