Peter Royal wrote:
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 01:22 AM, Stephen McConnell wrote:
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 06:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My only problem with this is that we are destroying a perfectly
acceptable package name. datasource was a lot more descriptive for
the datasource components than source is.
Suggestions welcome - I created an alternative package so that I
didn't break any existing usage of DataSource but enable the
migration to ServiceSelector as opposed to ComponentSelector. I
have no idea what the level of usage of the package is - I suspect
is is rather limited. The good news is that I can now build and run
James out of CVS.
Have repackaged the "source" package under "datasources".
Excellent. Beat me to thinking up a good suggestion :)
All I neeeded was a good nights sleep!
:-)
--
Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
