> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leo Simons > >> > >>Cool. Since y'all are not even commenting on the stronger > >>interface<->impl concept, I take it there's general > agreement on that?
I don't want to change A4 packages. That is not a point release (i.e. 4.2, 4.3) thing to do. It is something that Peter D. wanted to pursue with A5, and I am in favor of that approach. In fact, I am even more in favor of having a *client* jar only (i.e. equiv. of A4 Framework) with *no* implementations unless the class is *part* of the contract. Example would be the configuration object or the Version object. Things like ServiceManager/Locator/LookUpManager etc. implementations are usually container or even environment specific. Providing different implementations in separate JARS or incorporated into a UberContainer profile would be easy to do. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
