Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
I thought that this issue had been addressed, but I can't find the
vote results, if we had a vote.
I had a look too; we didn't actually vote. There was consensus on
doing this for avalon-framework, including documentation. There was
consensus on doing this for Developing with Avalon. For everything
else, Peter indicated he preferred to wait for <can't remember/>.
Thus, I'm asking to vote on this issue.
whom are you asking? Committers or PMC? If you're asking the PMC,
this vote is not valid because there hasn't been a formal proposal
first.
Asking Committers.
If this is not a pmc vote, is it then a "procedural vote" (seems like
it to me), ie do we then agree we need lazy majority consensus with
no vetoes applying?
Yes.
What is the rationale behind your proposal?
The same that applied when we got consensus before. I'm asking to
state that this is something we should abide to rather than just
"feel" it.
Code belongs to the community and legally to the ASF. This is to make
it clearer and prevent code ownership problems.
Do you want that all @author tags and all reference to authors of
source code files be removed from the files themselves? The
information about the authors will still be present in commit
messages and in the site credits.
what do you mean by "source file"? Java sources, or also all other
sources, like xdocs and buildfiles?
All source files = java, xdocs, buildfiles, etc.
+1
in my capacity as a committer,
+1, if the author information is replaced by "Avalon Development
Team" or something similar.
Yes, I forgot about specifying this.
+1 to add this part, and +1 to it.
ditto +1
--
Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
