> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Leo: > > There are a couple of points here: > > 1. The reason that we are discussing revision to the > PMC Voting procedures was initiated because the > current procedures are considered by some as > difficult to read - the subject of this message > concerns a structural change to what is already > adopted. I would prefer that we do not modify > the procedures in this way. If Berin wants see > the potential introduction of a change to the > procedures such that committer votes are > recognized then he should be proposing this a > seperate topic, potentially leading to a vote on > that topic.
The thing is that I have not changed anything that was in my mind from when we ratified the more legalese version. So, in effect we have uncovered a flaw in the more formal version--we agreed on something we did not mean to agree on because it was too difficult to dicern from the text. <snip/> > I.e. conclusion - drop the notion of committer votes (in other > words lets keep this thread about enhancing usibility of the > currently adopted procedures), and leave it to Berin to propose > a well prepared revision in the future (if he feels it is > necessary). That will happen only if I see a disproportionate amound of traffic on avalon-pmc vs. avalon-dev. IOW, as long as we keep everyone in the loop I am ok. We don't need to make it a formal requirement, at least not at this stage. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
