Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Some time ago I started this vote.
" ...
I'm asking you, do you want that for each [Proposal] and [Vote]
and release there be an entry in the STATUS file, that has to be
updated by the original item proposal?
[20020119]
+1: nicolaken, leosimons, mcconnell, jefft
+0:
-0: leosutic
-1:
"
AFAIK the result is that it has passed. I will close it if the vote count is ok.
Nicola:
I voted in favour of the principal -and I think was discussed at the time - the vote is basically a show of hands - its an expression of consensus on the approach but it is also meaningless in that failur to do the above has no substantive impact on the procedures. I.e. this is a decision - is result for a call for the "sense of house". This need to be a little clearer in the notes.
Cheers, Steve.
In practice, it would mean that the way in which Leo Sutic has just updated it after the last vote is just fine. Others would want to place the items in the agenda beforehand, but it's up to them.
-- Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.osm.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
