> > > It is not a bean and does not follow bean convetions.
> > Begs the question.
> http://mrs.umn.edu/~okeefets/grammar&usage.html

Thanks, but I claim that the usage was correct.  You are presuming the
conclusion.  Why isn't it a bean, and follow bean conventions?  Why invent
yet more patterns for the same thing?

        --- Noel


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to