> > > It is not a bean and does not follow bean convetions. > > Begs the question. > http://mrs.umn.edu/~okeefets/grammar&usage.html
Thanks, but I claim that the usage was correct. You are presuming the
conclusion. Why isn't it a bean, and follow bean conventions? Why invent
yet more patterns for the same thing?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
