At 07:26 4/4/01 +1000, Peter Donald wrote: >At 08:43 3/4/01 +0200, Leo Simons wrote: >><snipped> >>> To that end, I propose the following heirarchy: >>> >>> org.apache.avalon (stable subpackages and interfaces, etc.) >>> >>> org.apache.avalon.untested (packages and classes, etc under development) >> >>This seems the better solution from a marketing POV. Also, it >>removes some duplicity in naming (when accessing cvs, new users >>might think "framework? I thought Avalon was the framework". I >>just saw an existing user think that =). >> >>Perhaps it shouldn't be "untested" but "alpha" or >>"development". Doesn't matter that much. My +1. > >I would prefer a whole other name/brand for that ... >org.apache.???.*
or maybe org.apache.avalon.framework.* for framework (which is stable) and org.apache.avalon.* for the rest??? Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
