> Hmmm - we aren't any closer to deciding on how to lay this out yet so how > about this.
I agree we should settle this... > * I move camelot+atlantis into phoenix because phoenix is the > greatest user > of that stuff and camelot/atlantis is about same stability as phoenix. Smart thing. The interfaces should probably make it back into the framework once they get stable, but that is something to think about later. > * org.apache.avalon.* contains the stable framework code, nothing more > (currently what is in org.apache.framework in proposal) > > * org.apache.????.* contains all the components (currently what is in > org.apache.avalon.* in proposal minus camelot and atlantis) options: components framework aut avalondev more arthurian names: merlin morgana lancelot valiant castle sword lance dungeon tower excalibur I like "excalibur" myself. > This makes ??? a little cleaner and consistent. What do you think > of that ? as long as the specification ends up in org.apache.avalon.* in the end and phoenix is maintained as a brand name, I can definately live with this. I'm still all for the spec-with-RI model, but I suggest we leave that for later =) greetz, LSD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
