Stephen McConnell wrote: > > [last para from Berin email] > > To be honest, I would have a real problem if we didn't go beta because > > you didn't get to remove excalibur into a new CVS. According to all the > > feedback, noone agrees with the move--so why do it? And why punish those > > of us who want beta and stability because we don't have a separate CVS? > > Can I just confirm a couple of things - > perhaps its just me sifting through what is noise and what is serious.... > but I would appreciate confirmation of the following two points: > > 1. there was a proposed creating a new CVS to which there was uniform > disagreement ... therefore, I am presuming that it now off the agenda > (after all, this is an open process - and votes count)
Yes. (Hopefully noone thinks it is still on the agenda for beta release) > 2. I'm assuming the "veto" comment was off-the-cuff and should not be > taken seriously ... (but if I'm wrong, then there is a very serious > issue!) I sure hope so. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
