At 09:17 25/4/01 +0200, Leo Simons wrote: >> >> DynamicMbeanFactory will throw exceptions when there is >> get/is/set methods >> >> that don't conform to JavaBeans standard where I think it should just >> >> ignore them (Leo can you confirm that???). >> > >> >No (sorry). According to the specification, an object that us not a valid >> >JavaBeam/MBean will not be exposed. have no problem with going against >> >that spec...it'd mean we could never claim actual JMX compliance though. >> >> We are compliant with JavaBeans (they say ignore anything that doesn't fit >> pattern) >> however your implementation assumes that if they start with get >> they MUST bet a getter (which is not true in our case). Same with >> is and set. > >I fixed that, didn't I? >whoops...old copy in the CVS...ouch.
;) >addendum: that might be tomorrow...actually thought it was the day >after tomorrow today, so that my imaginary tomorrow would be the >weekend. This is of course not the case as today is today and that >other tomorrow is actually be a few days away which is why I did not >say what I ment. (if you followed that on the first run, congrats. >You're used to structural programming ;) alternatively you used to be a logic student ;) Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
