Giacomo Pati wrote: > > Quoting Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > I propose that we change this to org.apache.framework.* - My reasoning > > is > > > simple. A naive user who wants to know what Avalon is will assume > > > it is the > > > classes in org.apache.avalon.* (seems logical right?). > > > > question: why isn't it? Believe I said this before, but the _most_ > > logical thing to do would be have _everything_ under > > org.apache.jakarta.avalon.*. Ditching "jakarta" as that is not > > common practice: > > > > org.apache.avalon.framework > > org.apache.avalon.excalibur > > org.apache.avalon.phoenix > > org.apache.avalon.cornerstone > > org.apache.avalon.logkit > > +1 for me. I thought of it earlier but was not willing to influence your > debats > about branding Avalon. IMHO this would complete the branding of Avalon.
+1 from me. It solves all of our concerns and promotes Avalon as the container for everything. This is a relatively easy change, and it will be easy enough for the conversion script to adjust to. > > > AvalonFramework.jar or avalon-framework.jar > > > AvalonExcalibur.jar or avalon-excalibur.jar > > > > +1 to this one =) +1 from me. I can easily change the build script to reflect this: avalon-framework.jar avalon-excalibur.jar (This is the current pattern we are using for naming jars). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
