Peter Donald wrote: > > At 12:16 3/5/01 -0400, Berin Loritsch wrote: > >COURSE OF ACTION > >---------------- > >Yes) We do the migration by Friday May 4 and release LogKit 2.0b1(?) > >along > > with Avalon Framework/Excalibur 4.0b1 > > > >No) We do NOT migrate LogKit for a LONG while (at least two full > >release > > cycles for Framework). In any event, LogKit (version number?) > >should > > be marked Beta1 along with Framework/Excalibur > > Would you mind waiting to the 5th - then I could update Logkit the way I > wanted to and that should remain stable.
Nope. Don't mind a bit. > >REASONING > >--------- > >LogKit, Framework, and Excalibur are projects that are used directly by > >developers. It is critical that the API be stable. There really hasn't > >been much change to the LogKit API in a while--mostly just feature > >enhancements and bug fixes. The critical API used in clients is the > >Logger interface (which hasn't changed almost since the beginning) > > I don't think it has changed in any non-backwards incopmatible way at all ;) That's cool. But the time to change is upon us. Might as well sneak a few cool features in as well.... :) Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
