> > VOTE > > ---- > > > > LogKit follows same release plan as Framework/Excalibur > > > > I am +1 as they need each other.
+1 > > QUESTIONS > > --------- > > Has LogKit ever had an official release? > > What version should we apply to it? > > > > Since it is more independant of Framework/Excalibur I don't > > think we should match version numbers like MS artificial jump > > to Version 6 on its office suite. I don't know if you recall, > > but they had Word 5.x, Excel 4.x, PowerPoint 4.x, and Access 2.x > > and the next version for all of them was 6.0. I'd go for 2.0b... > > I found out after talking to my CTO, that the reason he was hesitant > > to use Avalon most was the lack of useful documentation. (I can > > say this because I wrote most of what we do have). He would like > > to see some stuff on how to break down a system into Components. > > He is familiar with OO techniques (a SystemUser object, a Dog, etc). > > and less with breaking down analasys into useful Components. I would > > like to see documentation on the correct manner to set up a Logger, > > and how to take advantage of Rolling Log Files, etc. I would like to not have a freeze on the xdocs dir in any case - I have been working on a "Getting Started with Avalon and Phoenix" tutorial-style thing. I will probably try and submit it to JavaWorld as well. It should help =) cheers! LSD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
