I think DefaultComponentSelector should be changed to ExcaliburComponentSelector as well.
- Kasper ----- Original Message ----- From: "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:10 PM Subject: [VOTE] Excalibur Component Manager naming > Due to the response that the naming of the Excalibur's Component Manager > is confusing, I propose to deprecate Excalibur's DefaultComponentManager > and rename the class to ExcaliburComponentManager. > > > More than one person has found that simply package name differentiation > is not enough. The goal is to have a relatively easily comprehensible > system. We should avoid unnecessary confusion (which this is) whenever > possible. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
