Peter Donald wrote: > > The arguements against this are generally; > * This means you can not download a single repository, cd into dir and > build automatically. You have to download them all. I don't see this as an > issue now (it may become an issue when phoenix enters beta state though). > When/if it becomes an issue we can simply update relevent project to store > binaries in CVS again
Why do people need to download everything? If you upload released configurations, and I upload daily configurations, people can pick one of the two to use as a startiing point. Then (assuming that interfaces are relatively stable), people can checkout the repositories that they care about and, in the process of building, effectively update their baseline accordingly. > * building against latest of everything (and thus not stable). This > shouldn't be an issue as framework+logkit is mostly stable now and > hopefully excalibur will be soon. (Besides we have gump to warn us of > issues ;]). What amuses me is that this wasn't a concern when avalon was in one cvs, but is now one when the exact same code is spread across multiple cvs'es. - Sam Ruby P.S. +1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
