> Peter Donald wrote: > > > > At 09:53 AM 6/6/01 -0400, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > >I would like to propose a vote to release 4.0b3 for > > >Avalon/Excalibur (quietly no general announcements) > > >due to a major bug I found in Excalibur's Component > > >Management framework. The bug stemmed from the > > >deprecation of the DefaultComponentManager/Selector > > >and moving to ExcaliburComponentManager/Selector. > > > > > >The DefaultComponentFactory tested to see if we > > >have an instance of a "DefaultComponentSelector" > > >instead of the "ExcaliburComponentSelector". When > > >I migrated Cocoon to use the propper version of > > >the ComponentSelector, this ugly bug showed up. > > > > > > > > >I would like to test and then release Beta 3 for > > >Framework/Excalibur. I am updating the Change > > >docs now. > > > > Fine by me. I would prefer minor releases for this sort of > thing (ie 2.1) > > but 3 works for me aswell ;) > > +1 for release > Slight preference for 4.0b3 over 4.0b2.1 but not fussed > Charles
+1 to that. Leo, who is going to write an avalon-based/JAMES-compatible/ Tomcat-contained webmail client for his new employer, but has lots of problems getting them to allow an OS release... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
