At 20:11 20.06.2001 +1000, Peter Donald wrote: >I am not sure who added it but after I described some of the features that I >saw as lacking in Log4j they started to appear in it. From a quick glance at >the source these were Filters, delayed serialization of events, type safe >enums for priority, dynamic reconfiguration capabilities etc.
What kind of barbiturates are you on? Let me know when you land back on Earth. >When you accused me of being dishonorable via "In the process, you have >copied from log4j without contributing back. I do not think this honors you. >We innovate, you copy." I assumed you meant I had stolen ideas. I can't see >how that is any different from what you have done. To be honest I think I >have "stolen" less ideas than you - just a few names. > >If however you are not accusing me of stealing ideas but instead of violating >copyright then that is another thing altogether. I would like to see >substantiated evidence that this has been the case for I do not apreciate >slander. There cannot be copyright violation between Apache projects. I regret to have responded to your bogus comments on log4j, a total waste of my time and yours. Ceki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
