> Hi, > > Once Berin finishes the docs what do you all think of doing a release of > framework (as stable), logkit (as stable), excalibur (as beta), > phoenix/cornerstone (as alpha). The reason is that I am getting > weekly emails > asking where they can download a release of phoenix and it is not > "released" > as such ;)
+1 > And if so what version should we place on Phoenix/Cornerstone ? I > would put a > 1.0a1 on Cornerstone but not sure about Phoenix. Well, the previous 'release' was 3.1a1, which included Cornerstone and Phoenix. In that context, I'd say we need a bigger version number than 3.1. I'd say we name both of them 3.5a1. The .5 instead of .2 because of significant progress and change since that last release. > Also is now the time that we can separate excalibur? ;) The docs are > separate, the produced jars are separate, the source directories > are separate > so it should be relatively painless. +1 > Also I have tried to clean up and simplify the releases directory. I have > placed HEADER.html files in all the right places to make it clearer about > where to get stuff. Also what do you think of anytime we make a > new release > we also create a HEADER.html in the release directory that lists > ChangeLog or > something similar? probably a good idea ;) greetz, Leo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
