Peter Donald wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 03:00, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > Framework and Excalibur are very stable products, and to boot, > > they are well tested. I think the documentation on the site > > is very good for a Open Source project, so I propose to > > create a final release for Framework/Excalibur 4.0. > > +1 for stable framework release. (Say this weekend?) > > However I am a little hesitent to release excalibur as non-beta until i18n > and thread packages are finalized and moved across. I would +1 a beta > release. Maybe if you don't mind waiting a week after framework I could > finish the threading stuff. > > Besides staggering the releases could make more noise and thus raise more > awareness ;)
Oh, and if you place Executable in Framework (framework.activity package +1), then we need to do it sooner rather than later (i.e. before friday). Ok. Framework Final friday? +1 Excalibur--new functionality so I would say 1 week for initial version, and one additional week before release to catch any bugs.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
