Peter Donald wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 01:16, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > That's the point. It really doesn't require alot of learning--I converted > > the tests for i18n package from JUnit to Testlet--which only forced me to > > change the class we extended and the name of one or two methods. All the > > tests pretty much functioned as is. > > > > As I mentioned in another thread, the graphical feedback of a red bar is > > much easier to catch than trolling through mountains of logs for the ERROR > > events--as the debug entries are necessary to figure out what is going on > > in case there is an error. > > > > JUnit is open source, so there is nothing that says we can't change things. > > Convinced ... if someone else was to do the work ;) We should probably also > put a note on testlet website indicating that it is deprecated in favour of > junit or something.
<joke> Wow, that was easy! I think this is the fastest I have ever gotten you to change your mind. This is a historical moment! </joke> We can do that. We will keep the Testlet stuff arround until everything is converted to JUnit. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
