On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Berin Loritsch wrote: > Peter Donald wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 06:10, giacomo wrote: > > > >>I have to confess that I don't know how this works in all my components > >>that are based on AbstractLoggable and have the logger passed in from > >>ExcaliburCM. > >> > > > > Just looked at ExcaliburCM and it doesn't really support separate loggers > > per > > component. Berin what do you think of adding an extra attribute to component > > definition so that you can specify name of logger. Then later on instead of > > doing > > > I was thinking about that before. We need to add an attribute to the > component > definitions (probably "logger"). Something like this to specify it: > > <component role="com.foo.Component" > class="com.foo.DefaultComponent" > logger="foo"/> > > The attribute name is negotiable ;). > > Think this will help, combined with your changes for the Logger?
I like it, +1. Giacomo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
