[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Berin, > > I just got to testing the new version of the pooling in CVS. I got the same > results as I did with my version, so that should be OK :)
Faster or slower? I think the fact that we are not releasing and reclaiming locks or continual looping helps bring our efficiency up. > I still have some problems in my load test, but that is all related to > SQLTransformer. I'll discuss that on C2-dev. The SQLTransformer gets 2 connections for every request--that needs to change, or the pool of connections needs to be greatly increased.... > Seems to me excalibur has a loadproof pooling now :) > > tomK That was my surmizing as well. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
