Quoting Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:27, Giacomo Pati wrote: > > Dear all > > > > I've a initial version of the ExcaliburTestCase ready for committment. > As > > it comes to packaging some thought need to be made. > > > > From the Excalibur point of view this class should make it into the > > distributed jar because it eases development based on Excalibur. From > a > > projects point of view it is noting that should be deployed into a > > production environment. The possibilities are: > > > > 1. Pack it into avalon-excalibur.jar. As it is only one class a > separate > > jar doesn't make much sense. > > +1
Ok, how do we package it. org.apache.avalon.excalibur.ExcaliburTestCase or org.apache.avalon.excalibur.test.ExcaliburTestCase Former will integrate without changes to the build procedure, but later will. Giacomo > > > > > > 2. Make a separate jar (avalon-excalibur-test.jar?). Though it is a > single > > class but based on junit it might be justifiable to do so. > > > > You thoughts? > > > > Giacomo > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > Cheers, > > Pete > > *-----------------------------------------------------* > * "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, * > * and proving that there is no need to do so - almost * > * everyone gets busy on the proof." * > * - John Kenneth Galbraith * > *-----------------------------------------------------* > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
