On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 21:31, Charles Benett wrote: > Here's a thought: can we get rid of all the build.sh/build.bat and > ant.jar etc?
nice idea but not yet good in practice I don't think. Anything that requires me to do more than cvs co myproject cd myproject ./build.sh is too much IMHO :) > Here's why: as currently written, I think, if you already have ANT_HOME > defined then the build script won't use jakarta-avalon/tools/lib and so > will miss optional.jar. (Which makes the junit task fail in excalibur). > > Either we can make the scripts more complicated to check for junit in a > pre-existing ANT_HOME or we can simply tell people that they need to > download and install ant with junit. Then we can remove the build > scripts and execute the buildfile by invoking 'ant' directly. alternatively we can go unset ANT_HOME in each script? -- Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* * "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, * * and proving that there is no need to do so - almost * * everyone gets busy on the proof." * * - John Kenneth Galbraith * *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
