On Fri, 17 Aug 2001 01:13, Charles Benett wrote: > For jars in lib's, I'd like to move to using name-version jars (for > releases)
+1 > or name-date jars for non-released code - specifically between > avalon subprojects. -0 Mainly because then we have to maintain code name in two places (in build.xml and filename). > This would make it a lot easier to work out and track what's happening. > Any objections? Slight objection - but not enough to stop you doing it ;) -- Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* * "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, * * and proving that there is no need to do so - almost * * everyone gets busy on the proof." * * - John Kenneth Galbraith * *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
