On Fri, 17 Aug 2001 02:35, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Hi, > > In ExtendedPatternFormatter.getTypeIdFor(), a "super." is missing for > actually calling the superclass method.
fixed. > BTW, why don't you merge ExtendedPatternFormatter in PatternFormatter ? It was a safety thing ... ie I know everything in PatternFormatter is used and are willing to support it. Not so sure about ExtendedPF but will probably merge EPF into PF before next release - not sure ;) -- Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* * "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, * * and proving that there is no need to do so - almost * * everyone gets busy on the proof." * * - John Kenneth Galbraith * *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
