On Tue, 21 Aug 2001 03:47, giacomo wrote: > On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Peter Donald wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 20:47, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > Yes, the first thought I had about the name was exactly > > > "AndRotateStrategy". > > > > Sounds good to me unless anyone else has any preferences? > > Well, it might be irritating but that Strategy runs like this: > > Strategy1 || Strategy2 > ie. > size > 10M || (currentTime - last) > 24hours > > Isn't it? Shouldn't it be OrRotateStrategy?
doh! Good point. OrRotateStrategy kinda works ... I think I prefer MultiRotateStrategy. Not sure. > > Giacomo > > > > Should I repost the contribution with the new name? > > > > Naah - I will just rename locally ;) > > > > > Carsten > > > > > > > Peter Donald wrote: > > > > > > > > Hmmm. What about the names > > > > > > > > * MultiRotateStrategy (multiple strategies) > > > > * AndRotateStrategy (ands the results of multiple strategies) > > > > > > > > or something else ??? > > > > > > > > On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:03, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > attached is a simple version of a HierarchicalRotateStrategy (also > > > > > the name might not be perfect). > > > > > It can be initialized with an array of RotateStrategy objects. If > > > > > the isRotationNeeded() method is needed this array is queried until > > > > > all objects are processed or the first one responds with true. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* * "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, * * and proving that there is no need to do so - almost * * everyone gets busy on the proof." * * - John Kenneth Galbraith * *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
