On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Paul Hammant wrote: > True, but other teams could <b>decide</b> that Avalon is good enough to > be a foundation at some point.
I thing letting them know that Avalon is ready for prime time would be needed. Besides, duplication makes newbies having a hard time (ie: deciding which one to use). Eg: Excalibur has db pooling, so does Turbine. >I think it all starts with Tomcat. If > we ported a simple HTTP server (resurrect PicoServer) to Avalon, then > the Tomcat team might like what they see and make plans themselves. It seems that the World needs a "Kitten" web server. Sure, Tomcat would fulfill all your web server feature needs, but I believe that there are people who'd like to have something more lighter. Say, in Java Programming 101 course, students can implement a db based security module for the lightweight web server. Oki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
